Progress and Consistency Tool

Overall Teacher Judgements

The Ministry of Education has invested a great deal of time and money into an online computer program that is designed to help teachers make more informed judgments about what level the students are operating in the curriculum.  They call this program the PaCT which is Progress and Consistency Tool.  (Click here to go to the website)

As part of yesterday's Teacher Only Day programme the Year 7 & 8 teachers (and Junior Maths teachers) were introduced to this tool.  It was pleasing to see teachers become early adopters of this technology.

Some of the benefits of the PaCT system include...

1. Automatic communication with Kamar - the two administration systems sync together.
2. The individualised nature of PaCT where each student is individually judged.
3. The multiple illustrated exemplars (with teacher-student dialogue) make for very clear indications of where in the spectrum students consistently sit.
4. These illustrations become a good check point for staff to reflect upon the level of the class.
5. The entire cohort data will be available to better allow for monitoring and planning around year levels.  

One of the comments was that with greater awareness of the PaCT tool that there will be an increased level of consistency around overall teacher judgments between teachers, schools, and different years which can only be beneficial.  

 This post relates to RTC #11. "Analyse and appropriately use assessment information, which has been gathered formally and informally - i. analyse assessment information to identify progress and ongoing learning needs of ākonga." And ERO's School Evaluation Indicators Domain 4 "Responsive Curriculum, Effective Teaching and Opportunity to Learn - Effective Assessment for learning."

Year 10 Conference

Conference Flyer

Owning Your Future

Today our year ten students spent the day out of school at the Waihi Academy on conference.  This inaugural annual event is the brain child of Learning Leaders Jo Howell and Vicki Speirs.  The purpose here is to take a break from the regular routines of school life and present a days worth of workshops and keynote addresses from former Waihi College students.  

Introduction of Keynote

Year 10 was chosen as this represents a key age in adolescence where students have been through the institution of school but now viewing the world with increased maturity.  We have timed this conference to be just ahead of subject selection for the first year of NCEA Level One.    
Seven ex student leaders from previous years at Waihi College made the presentations and keynote address (which was given by Adrian Holmes).  

Those students included...

1. Adrian Holmes (class of 2003)
2. Anna O'Hagen (class or 2008)
3. Samanatha Sanderson (class of 2011)
4. Tina Youngman (class of 2001)
5. Natasha Staheli-Lowe (class of 2012)
6. Jack Kingsford (class of 2011)
7. Ariana Te Wake (class of 2005)

Our hope is that from today many future dreams would have been formed and that our students will see the next three years (plus) at Waihi College as being an avenue to launch their futures.  

It is vital that I acknowledge the excellent efforts of Jo Howell and Vicki Speirs who's collective efforts and initiative brought together a brilliant day.  Tremendous thanks also goes to Tony Kang and the staff at Waihi Academy for providing a fantastic venue and delicious meals.  

This post relates to RTC #2. "Demonstrate commitment to promoting the well-being of all ākonga."  And RTC #7. "Promote a collaborative, inclusive and supportive learning environment".  And ERO's School Evaluation Indicators Domain 6 Knowledge Building for Improvement and Innovation "Participation in evaluation, inquiry and knowledge building activities contributes to changes in thinking and behaviour and builds inquiry 'habits of mind' ".

Classroom Expectations

Evolution of Education

When I first began teaching I was *taught* a very traditional way of managing a classroom.  The basic presumptions were...

1. That getting students to work was the key to learning.
2. Work looked like silence, lots of writing, solo participation.
3. That students would actively look to doing minimal work.
4. Teachers were to pressure students into doing the work.  

The following PowerPoint presentation begins with some photographs which sum up that philosophy on education.  The dog with a biscuit on his nose - this can be done by training that the dog (aka the student) would want to eat straight away (not work in class) and the owner (aka teacher) would have to be in control.  


The other image of an alpha wolf represents the way teachers were modeled to control.  That you would rigidly police the students into obedience.  This was often done through faking aggression - don't smile until Easter on steroids.  

Classroom Expectations from WaihiCollege

The video which I showed echo'd this management style...

Looking at this video what messages were represented?

• Discipline?  Humiliation?  Inhumanity?
• Education centered on facts?
• Education centered on the teacher?
• Misogyny? 

One of the things that you may have missed in this clip.  This is about the older teacher showing the new teacher 'how it is done'.  

The evidence now is very clear - the best teaching is done in an environment where mutual respect is paramount.  Todd Whitaker puts it very well in his book (click here) What great teachers do differently; “The teacher who sets a positive tone can influence the interactions of everyone in the school” (p. 55)

This post relates to RTC #2. demonstrate commitment to promoting the well-being of all ākonga.  And RTC #7. promote a collaborative, inclusive and supportive learning environment.  And ERO's School Evaluation Indicators Domain 4 Effective Teaching "Students experience an environment in which it is safe to take risks and errors provide opportunities to learn".  

NASDAP Conference 2015

Thoughts from Conference

I had been looking forward to this year's Deputy Principal's annual conference.  The theme for this year was 'Disobedience - Jump out of the safe zone'.  The idea being that we should be avoiding getting comfortable in our roles and how our schools sit in education.

The conference was extremely well attended with approximately 350 senior managers from around the country.  The bi-annual conference is a nationwide event covering all the regional areas.  This year was held at Skycity.  

During this conference there was a consistent theme about questioning the perceived limitations of schooling, curriculum and traditional assumptions around education.  This was, naturally, a theme eagerly grabbed by our key note speakers.

I very much enjoyed the speech by Mai Chen who presented an excellent summary of education from the perspective of a parent.  Her story of immigration to New Zealand as a six year old and inevitable rise in Law whilst inspirational was grounded in the nitty gritty of life. 

Mai presented her notion of 'disobedience' as deliberately avoiding getting too comfortable with life.  That when we're overtly familiar with our surroundings and systems that we should "choose which tiger to throw a stone at".  

Nathan Makaere Wallis was another keynote speaker who I found to be excellent.  I have already posted a entry on his ideas (click here).  For me Nathan's core message was about getting young people to cognitively process their ideas/actions/words prior to decisions.  He illustrated this well by describing sitting with a young person and going through the 'game' of "what would you do if insert idea happened?"  The notion being that rehearsal.  [Nathan is coming to speak at the college on the 22nd of next month].  
  
The third keynote address I enjoyed greatly was by Steve Maharey (former Education Minister and current Vice-Chancellor of Massey University).  He presented a very good synopsis of what are the key characteristics of those students who will thrive in the future (critical thinking, self management, collaboration, innovation etc).  

This post relates to RTC #4. "Demonstrate commitment to ongoing professional learning and development of personal professional practice - ii. participate responsively in professional learning opportunities within the learning community." And ERO's School Evaluation Indicators Domain 2. "Leadership promotes and participates in a coherent approach to professional learning and practice."

Know Thy Impact

As a part of a series of workshops on Visible Learning Plus (the supplementary material for John Hattie's seminal work).  This is the presentation that was made to staff in our afternoon meeting.  

The purpose here is to form a collective understanding of the shared practice here at Waihi College around use of assessment information.  

Being a teacher who uses quality data to inform our practice is a vital component of modern teaching.  But there is a genuine plethora of data available to staff and this can create issues around sifting through this information.  

Here is the powerpoint that was presented.  The key points are...

1. Teachers should be responsive to the students needs. 
2. We should be self reflective on our practice (are we making the difference - having an impact).
3. There are a variety of types of assessment - each with their own purpose.  We should be using the full gambit to inform ourselves.
4. This ties very well into 'Teaching as Inquiry' - which is a core component of our appraisal system and the Registered Teacher Criteria.  

Know thy impact 10th august 2015 from WaihiCollege

Here is a copy of the video that was presented. 

This post relates to RTC #6  "Conceptualise, plan and implement an appropriate learning programme." And RTC #8. "Demonstrate in practice their knowledge and understanding of how ākonga learn- i) enable ākonga to make connections between their prior experiences and learning and their current learning activities & iii) encourage ākonga to take responsibility for their own learning and behaviour."And ERO's School Evaluation Indicators Domain 4. "Assessment activities are inclusive, authentic and fit-for- purpose, providing relevant and meaningful evidence to evaluate the student's achievement and progress." 

Interesting Video

This was presented to us a the NASDAP conference as a critique of much of what is wrong with modern educational reality.

Enjoy (bit cringe worth).

Achieving Educational Success as Maori

The Prerogative of Maori Education

In keeping with the theme of the Maori Language Week here is a post on education of Maori.  The following power point was presented at staff meeting on Monday.

Maori achieving as maori from WaihiCollege

Many of our schools 2015 priority learners recognise themselves as Maori.  Part of our responsibility (duty of care) for the students in our classroom is effectively providing for their (and their whanua's) needs.

Questions that we need to ask...

1. How am I going as a teacher (am I positively impacting the learning)?
2. What informs me on my answer to Q.1.?
3. What is my sense of urgency around this?

[These questions need to be asked of the students as well].  

This post is related to RTC #1. "Establish and maintain effective professional relationships focused on the learning and well-being of ākonga." And RTC #7. "Promote a collaborative, inclusive and supportive learning environment part ii. foster trust, respect and cooperation with and among ākonga.  And ERO's School Evaluation Indicators Domain 3 "Educationally Powerful Connections and Relationships".

Educating Boys'

Males and NCEA

I began my teaching career in a traditional single sex boys high school.  My initial years were grounded in School Certificate, Six Form Certificate and Bursary - these were systems that I was familiar with (I was a product of them myself).  

Peter Lyons - Otago Daily Times

An opinion piece by Peter Lyons (an economics teacher from St Peter's in Auckland) in the New Zealand Herald (click here) raises the issue of gender inequality in education - specifically in NCEA qualifications.  Whilst acknowledging the pitfalls of making generalised statements Lyon's points out that "NCEA is a standards-based assessment system. Many boys seem to adopt the attitude that meeting the minimum standard will suffice."

I wanted to know how reflective this statement would be for us here at Waihi College.  Do we in fact have results that reflect boys struggling in NCEA compared with the girls (and if so what does that mean for us as an educational institution)?

Here are some of our NCEA results from last year...  Level One 2014 had Girls endorsed with Excellence 6.3% (boys were at 3.3%) Girls endorsed with Merit 46.9% (boys were at 23.3%).  Similar results existed for Level Two. Level Three was more even.  So it would not be out of place to say that girls have twice the rate of excelling in NCEA than the boys last year in NCEA.  

Some of the specific issues Lyon has with NCEA include the lack of competitiveness and that instructional nature of assessments; "Boys are also generally less inclined to read instructions carefully. NCEA assessments are laden with instructions, assessment criteria and much additional reading material that camouflages the actual questions that need to be answered."  This are observations which I tend to agree with.  

So what is it that can be done by teachers here at Waihi College to counter these?  I would strongly suggest that regular review of the progress of students through NCEA (one of the core roles of the senior Pouako) would add to the competitive nature among boys.  We have annual goals around endorsement (L1 3 x Exc + 21 x Mer : L2 5 x Exc + 20 x Mer : L3 3 x Exc + 6 x Mer) - we will need boys to be better represented to gain these rates.  

Opportunities and expectations around internal assessments are key.  Are boys not taking the opportunities for 'sign posting' or re-submissions or resits?  Teachers having real conversations about the high expectations for our boys is key.  Are we pushing our boys and creating that environment of excellence?  In ERO's School Evaluation Indicators Domain 4 : Responsive curriculum, effective teaching and opportunity to learn "teachers and students co-construct realistic and challenging learning goals..." 

This post is related to RTC #1. "Establish and maintain effective professional relationships focused on the learning and well-being of ākonga." And RTC #7. "Promote a collaborative, inclusive and supportive learning environment part ii. foster trust, respect and cooperation with and among ākonga.  And ERO's School Evaluation Indicators Domain 4.

Book Review

Changing Our Secondary Schools by Bali Haque

I really enjoyed this educational theory book, especially because this is written by a kiwi, who has worked in the New Zealand system and understands the changes specifically in the New Zealand educational system.  

Bali Haque is a well known figure in the New Zealand educational community being a former principal Pakuranga and Rosehill Colleges, President of the Secondary Principals' Association, deputy chief of NZQA and an executive member of the PPTA.  In recent years he has worked in Rarotonga.  

In Changing Our Secondary Schools Bali has analysed the major changes to the New Zealand Education system over the last three decades.  It is easy to see the level of change our sector has been subjected too.  I enjoyed his summaries and gained from seeing these changes from a management/strategic point of view.  My experiences have been predominantly as a teacher this book helped me see some of the logic behind the theory.  

Bali is highly critical mostly of implementation of the policies rather than the specific policies themselves.  Highlighting the compromises built upon compromises resulting in some avoidable problems.  He focuses much of his criticism on the divisions (and conflict) that exist in New Zealand secondary schooling systems.  

In the second half of the book Bali takes deliberate aim at many sacred cows in the system.  He has strong ideas which can be summarised as incendiary.  Paying excellent teachers 'excellence units', aiming to remove incompetent (and marginally competent) teachers from the ranks, making all but five weeks of holidays an expectation for teachers to be onsite, raising the entry requirement for teacher training a masters qualification, removing the focus from extra curricular, to name a few.  

On the issue of collective professionalism Bali writes "It is important to serious address the problem of incompetent and mediocre teachers... teaching is too important a profession to tolerate free riders and level high flyers unrewarded.".  

I would recommend Changing Our Secondary Schools to teachers who are new to NZ (as it gives some excellent background information about how we got here), teachers who have a mind for the politics of schooling, senior management (as much of the change lies with them).  It is an easy reading book and one that had me thinking late into the night.  

This post relates to RTC #12 - "Engaging with professional literature and reflecting on ones practice".

  

ERO School Evaluation Indicators (Part I)

Effective Practice At Waihi College

The Education Review Office have recently published a trial document called "School Evaluation Indicators: Effective Practice for Improvement and Learner Success".  As the name suggests this is the office's concise guide to what things they want to see happening in our school to produce effective results.  

The guide has an express purpose of providing a "common language for the interaction and dialogue between a school and ERO about development since the last review."  These are effectively the a-b-c's of effective management and running of a NZ school.  This is the first of two publications (the second companion resource is due out in September this year) that schools can use to confirm their progression and development.  

A common observation I've been able to make in my time in teaching is that when ERO announce their dates for review schools are ready (they had in their last review an indication of how many years until the next review).  At Waihi College our 2014 report indicated that three years would be the time for the next review.  In my experience teachers sharpen up their paperwork and a generally geared up for a review, but there is always an unknown element.  Teachers would say "what wheelbarrow will ERO come pushing this time around?" - that there are things that the review team would 'spring' on schools.  The School Evaluation Indicators  is a document which will take away any surprise element for an ERO visit - it effectively spells out, in great detail, what things they'll be be asking.  

This document is an easily digestible 42 pages which begins in theory.  They base their indicators on several things;  25 years of reviews, modern education research, the NZ Curriculum document, legislation, National Administration Guidelines (NAG's), best evidence synthesis, OECD reports and input from Helen Timperley and Viviane Robinson.  Personally I feel comfortable with the indicators themselves, and feel that they're grounded in sound educational theory.  

I've ordered several extra copies for staff (three for the Learning Leaders), there is one available in Alistair's office and one from mine.  

I've been able to link blog posts to the Registered Teacher Criteria, I will from here on attempt to link (where appropriate) future posts to the appropriate School Evaluation Indicators.  

This post relates to RTC #5. show leadership that contributes to effective teaching and learning

and School Evaluation Indicator - Domain Two : Leadership conditions for equity and excellence and Domain Five : Professional Capability & Collective Capacity.  

 

Parent Teacher Interviews

Parent Teacher Interviews

Next Wednesday we will have our annual parent teacher interview day.  Administratively this day has been made much easier with the invention of online booking through www.schoolinterviews.co.nz (which is good for parents and staff admin).  But the time old tradition of interviews have continued with the same old barriers.

• Parental Reluctance.  There exists a tendency for parents who were themselves struggling at school to avoid interaction with the institution (especially us teachers).  How can we best encourage/invite these types of parents in to school to talk education?
• Students Painting A Different Story.  The realities of modern parenting is that often the messages from the students are taken as canon by the parents.  

Good Guidelines for Running An Interview.

1.  Know your students.  This sounds obvious but being ahead of the curve is very important.  Are you able to pin point their progression in their learning?  Where are they excelling/struggling?  What interest levels do they have?  What things increase their engagement?
2.  Know who's coming.  Look at your bookings and organise all your information for interviews.  It pays to have assessment results and classroom work handy.  Being able to speak to parents with reference to the students work is powerful.  It adds greatly to your perception of credibility if you're organised.
3.  Listen first.  It's a good thing to begin "thanks for coming in today/tonight you've had a chance to read X's report, before we begin were there any issues that you'd like me to cover?"  Some parents will have a bee in their bonnet and it's important that you listen and process their issue (this doesn't mean getting bombed upon - see point #6 below).  
4.  Talk about time factors.  Have a clock handy acknowledge the booked time, how long you've got available, check that you've got their contact details should the interview go too long.  
5.  Ask about their observations/hopes/plans.  The parents are potentially very powerful drivers of learning for the student.  It is important to know where they're at and build upon this.  A parent that says X is a bit bored is probably asking for extension material.  A parent that says X is not enjoying this subject this year is probably saying that your not X's preferred teacher.   
6.  Keeping it professional.  There are parents out there that will be unreasonable and cross boundaries.  Be prepared to finish up an interview early.  Saying "I don't think that we're getting ahead here, lets reschedule this meeting for later when we've got more time".  Standing up is a non aggressive way of finishing an interview.  Do communicate with your colleagues/management about your interviews... have someone to support you.  
7.  Thank the parents for their time.  

This post relates to RTC # 1. "Establish and maintain effective professional relationships focused on the learning and well-being of ākonga i)  engage in ethical, respectful, positive and collaborative professional relationships with: whānau and other carers of ākonga" 

Ohinemuri Schools' Festival of Education

Mind Frames of Change

Yesterday the Learning Leaders and I were lucky enough to head over to the inaugural Education Festival held at Paeroa College.  Our intent was to go and see the keynote address by Lynda Shanks from Cognition Education in Auckland.  Cognition are the educational providers for John Hattie's Visible Learning Plus.

Here is a summary of the key messages I took away from Lynda's presentation...

There are three main messages of change presented; 1.  What are visible learners?  2.  What are the mind frames of the teachers (are we change agents in education)?  3.  What system reform is required in schools?

The notion of building up a shared language of learning was key.  The question - when your students are asked "what was learning like today?" would they say "fun" or "busy" or would they be able to describe their learning?  This question was supplemented with video of students verbalising their experiences in the classroom.  

How is it that we collectively as Waihi College staff are going about embedding the language of learning within our students?  Do we have a 'way' of learning that is uniform, do our students know it, and is it best practice?

Lynda went through Stephen Covey (recommended author or the The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People) basic change model.  How is it that we as educators know that we've actually made an impact on the learning of our students?

• See - School Culture, personal beliefs, and traditions.  
• Do - School structure/policies/rules/programmes.
• Behave - the results and effects (e.g. achievement results).

Lynda then moved into the purpose of the workshops on the day.  She encouraged all of us to see ourselves as the change agents for our schools.  To begin this through a series of self reflective questioning.  

1. How am I doing with my students?
2. Where am I going to next in my practice?
3. How am I going to get there?
4. What can I control as a teacher?
5. Do we challenge all of our students in our classes?
6. Do we plan lessons from different points of view (the most able or those struggling)?
7. Do we fall into the habit of labeling students? 

Overall the presentation was great.  Lynda is clearly a communicator who is grounded in the experiences of the the classroom.  

This post relates to  RTC#8. "Demonstrate in practice their knowledge and understanding of how ākonga learn." and RTC#7. "Promote a collaborative, inclusive and supportive learning environment.